Rural voters victim of conservative fiscal nonsense

by Ken MacDougall

I’ve always been stunned at the propensity of taxpayers here on the Prairies falling for the machismo nonsense of conservative-thinking politicians whenever they start mentioning an individual’s “right” to be able to do things on his own – which, translated, means that you’re going to have to pay for this sooner or later, and since our corporate friends want you to start “now”, let’s get the con job underway, the sooner the better.

Gerry Ritz, probably the most ideologically driven of these, and his good friend Stephen Harper, pulled off what to me has been the greatest theft of farm assets when the Conservatives effectively pulled the chain and flushed away the Canada Wheat Board.

The Board, a federal agency that had been selling both barley and wheat on behalf of Canadian farmers since the end of World War II, found itself in courtroom in August of 2012, the beheading sword to be delayed for a few more years as the “Marketing Freedom for Farmers Act” was proclaimed. Harper, to the cheers of a few of Ritz’s farmer friends around Kindersley, even “pardoned” those poor schmucks who’d been unfortunate enough to get fined or jailed when they tried to sell their produce on to buyers in the United States.

Now, one would have thought in listening to Harper and Ritz stress the “importance” of this Act to the farming community that the number of their brethren convicted under previous administrative procedure totalled numbers that Donald Trump alleged were complicit in voter fraud during the 2020 Presidential election; as usual, though, they were more Biden-like– ten, in all.

Was this Act even necessary? Of course not; all 10 convictions were registered prior to 1998, when enraged by one of its members having received sentence merely for having delivered grain to a 4-H Club FOB, legislation was introduced to give farmers full management rights over the CWB and elect its own Directors, so that such stupidity could never happen again. In the fourteen years following much-needed changes to legislation, the CWB functioned as it should have, selling grain for its 150,000 or more members at the highest possible prices, treating each producer as “equal” irrespective of operational size and crop produced– that is, until the Harper government gave away the $17 billion in CWB assets to a company supported by a Saudi prince, just so the Saudi regime would buy Canadian LAV’s to use in further incursions into foreign lands such as Yemen.


OK – I “get it” – the part where the producer wants to be recognized for his contribution to keeping Canadians from starving, at least. However, all that this Act did was speed the demise of the small grain producer. Today, most farms are little more than massive corporations, with their land holdings in production measured in “townships”, not mere “sections”.

But if ANY of these producers feel that, with the size of their operations, a senior official from any of these American agribusinesses buying their product is going to even remember their name, much less greet them at the door with a case – or even a bottle of 50-year-old Scotch, they’ve just been conned by Gerry Ritz.

In 2014, these farmers who’d “fought so hard for the right to market their own crops” found out what “individuality” brings as an award to their efforts. Now even lacking the Crow’s Nest agreement with CP Rail on the subsidization of grain transportation, American agribusinesses started the buying season off by offering lowest price possible, withholding information as to the premiums buyers were prepared to pay for prompt delivery of quality product, and using whatever means necessary to have their shipments “prioritized” over others, creating the biggest backlog of Canadian grain movement in our nation’s history.

The subsequent penalties and fines for delayed shipment, ALL by the way passed on to the producers, ended up costing EACH and EVERY ONE of our 43,000 provincial producers an average of $118,000 – a point that neither our good MP Randy Hoback nor his good friend Gerry Ritz challenged when I first commented upon that reality back in 2014.


Now, I’ve only brought up the CWB because over the next two columns, I’m going to tear apart the fictional literature of the Descents of Devine Party, aka the Saskatchewan Party, for their ability to publicize the fables of two premiers, Brad Wall and Scott Moe, making light of the NDP governments of Roy Romanow, and later Lorne Calvert, in their a valiant attempt to restructure health care services and education in our rural settings, where the population was trending downward in a big hurry.

Did these changes implemented by the NDP not save us money in the long run? Of course they did.

Was the Romanow government unaware of the drastic need to inject monies into, in particular, the provision of health care services, as opposed to “cutting back” on such services, as was being PERCEIVED by rural-based Saskatchewanians?

Of course they were; however, what they FAILED to do is explain to rural Saskatchewan that in order to be able to deliver increasingly costly health care services at affordable prices in the future, they had to FIRST find some coin that the Devine government hadn’t squandered so that they could address this issue with confidence, WITHOUT in that near future having to raise taxes, as premiers Wall and Moe have had to do.

The issue here is one of “contingencies”, or what has to be done during crisis management situations.

The DoD Party seems totally incapable of planning for some future downturn; for instance, wasn’t it the moderator of the leadership debate who closed the program down by stupidly asking Dr. Meili WHERE the NDP would get the funds necessary to implement the much stricter intervention they were calling for now, working on a “theory” that the spread of the COVID virus would get worse as we approached Christmas?

The situation DID worsen – and our premier, instead of announcing the need for a more strict imposition of limits to gathering and mask-wearing, leaves that announcement to Saskatchewan’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Shahab.

There is no point now in noting that Dr. Meili was correct in calling for increasingly stronger measures; asking Premier Moe that question now would be like, as Jason Kenney would put it, interjecting an “NDP bias” into this health care issue. But in an election, isn’t the point of the campaign for the public to analyze which party is better prepared to handle the future concerns of our province or nation?

For two elections now, 2011 and 2020, the Descendants of Devine Party have found it amusing to keep pointing out the “results” of premier Romanow having imposed their organizational skills upon both educational and health care services, while ignoring the future benefits such actions created. We should be celebrating the fact that both Romanow and Calvert found money to reinvest in health care, as these reforms even allowed Saskatchewan to provide more expensive – and expansive – services for an ageing Baby Boomer society. In 1997 and 1998, every other government in Canada, and especially that of PM Mulroney, didn’t think “boomers” were the issue; there was just too MUCH “health care” available to the public, and it was the fiscal responsibility of our leaders to “cut back”.

Now, as the “boomers” absorb the worst of the COVID pandemic, we’ve a premier managing this crisis by worrying more about whether his “base” have to wear masks in public or their celebrations further curtailed by “social distancing”.

With friends like the premier, one can only hope that Dr. Shahab hasn’t many “enemies”.

Hollow words show hypocrisy of educational funding

By Ken MacDougall

I’ve often said in private that the followers of the Descendants of Devine Party, aka the Saskatchewan Party, are beginning to blindly follow their leaders and not observing political behaviour and assessing policy that can apply to today’s issues or even the distant future. It also bothers me that the sycophants falling for the nonsense that this group dishes up as policy are mostly of rural stock, a population to which this province owes a great favour in helping free our economy from the yoke-like grip of central Canadian and American farm implement manufacturers and fought for the creation of a medical delivery system that especially in the United States is viewed as a basic human right.

The DoD’s have over the past 11 years of provincial rule campaigned on the broken and false record of NDP governments in the 1990’s and early 2000’s having laid waste to the health and educational facilities of the province, allegedly closing 52 so-called “hospitals” that by today’s standards couldn’t even meet the criteria for medical facilities functioning as “acute care” locations, and 176 schools whose total population doesn’t even come close to the need for building an adequate number of high schools in Regina and Saskatoon that the Saskatchewan Party is dithering over at the moment to address school growth issues in urban centres. What’s going on here?

However constrained by rural voter turn-out for NDP candidates in the last three elections, part of the re-education process desperately needed in Saskatchewan is for the NDP to face up the public relations disaster they have created with rural voters with these two issues. This requires the party to painstakingly analyze – in PUBLIC – the “mistakes” they made (even though these closures weren’t economic errors) in communicating with voters as to “why” these choices had to be made at the time that they were acted upon, prior to the Saskatchewan Party taking office in 2007.

Such a public confessional is needed so as to sway these rural voters to consider future policy options proposed by the NDP, be it in providing rural Saskatchewan with complete and low cost high speed Internet service, better policing without stealing resources from our cities, diversifying agricultural practice by helping small farm operators turn their lands into market garden producers, or forcing the DoD Party to develop a farmer-friendly environmental policy before anyone gets any further carried away with the idea of using $4 billion in taxpayers’ monies just to have the already chemically polluted lands surrounding Lake Diefenbaker turned into another episode of Flint, MI, Love Canal or Quill Lakes land pollution nightmares that were such hot topics during the Saskatchewan Party leadership debate in Melfort.

In an October 21st, 2020 article carried by the CBC, former CEO of the Health Services Utilization and Research Commission Steven Lewis noted that health care restructuring undertaken by the Romanow government deeply upset rural voters, even though the implemented changes had absolutely NO impact upon their quality of care. Despite this sentiment, Lewis still considers the DoD “reminder” approach they keep playing around with during these campaigns as being nothing more than “cheap politics”.

You can’t really blame our rural voters for having this “We’ll never forgive you for taking these services away from us,” especially when you consider how schools and “hospitals” came to be built throughout rural Saskatchewan, starting in the late 1890’s. When refugees from Europe began fleeing their feudal existences, especially during the Bolshevik Revolution, the very idea of being able to finally settle in a place where their children could freely obtain an education and proper health care was merely a dream for them to consider. However, once settled, the local school’s existence took on even more while as the size of rural families continued to rise, the health and wellbeing of both the family and community became even more important items to preserve along the road to the community’s very survival.

It would have been wonderful in this last election if voters had had the chance to grill the two major parties over the decisions made on health care and education restructuring, particularly in 2016 when NDP hard-core supporters found themselves fighting the Election of 2011 and 2007 all over again. That, however, wasn’t going to happen. Thanks to the fact that the 2020 campaign was run during the height of the Covid-19 crisis, debate in a public forum was not possible, while in 2011, the former DoD leader, Brad Wall, simply told his candidates not to bother participating in any debate other than the leadership fiasco, and pretend they were out campaigning, as meeting voters face-to-face was more important than rehashing old arguments – which, of course, the DoD were doing by repeating the educational and health care lies of the 2007 campaign.

In the CBC interview, Premier Moe was asked “why” it was so important that his party’s candidates continue to lead the campaign off in such fashion. His answer, however, brings forward almost the same sense of frustration as we have just spent witnessing the four years of Donald Trump’s presidency – the excuse of getting the voter base “motivated”.

Moe, himself, spews his own propaganda, maintaining that “We [the Saskatchewan Party] have a record of growth, they [the NDP] have a record of decline” – this coming from a premier whose party has brought the provincial deficit back to the levels experienced during the Devine era, all while destroying the fiscal comfort basket left from the Lorne Calvert / Roy Romanow era, watching the markets for non-renewable resources shrink to nothingness, failing to diversify the provincial economic base, and failing in the entire eleven years of its existence to even come close to balancing the budget.

Oh, and don’t forget – doing nothing to reverse the decisions of the Romanow government as to how health care and educational reorganization.

Despite the Saskatchewan Party’s protestations as to how the NDP’s decisions from 1992 to 2007 are supposed to have gutted rural Saskatchewan’s educational offerings, what the DoD has done by its ongoing cuts to vital services is having a far more dangerous effect upon complete rural program offerings than ever before.

And that, folks, is why I believe rural Saskatchewan voters should be reconsidering their cult-like behaviours and re-examining just who did what to whom in 1991 through 2007 – and who’s really CAUSING the suffering as a result.


A small note of condolence and apology to the few remaining faithful members of the Liberal Party of Canada for ACCIDENTALLY using the scatological spelling of the Prime Minister’s last name in last week’s column. Honest, it was an “accident”…

As well, we note at this time that our province not only does not have enough doctors or teachers, but it also seems “forceful” salespersons are an endangered species, as apparently egina has been “forced” to hire a collection agency from Alberta to follow up payment on delinquent traffic fines and, presumably, land taxes. Sigh…

Health care reform claims blur the lessons of history

by Ken MacDougall

Last week I noted the hypocrisy of Saskatchewan Party claiming for the third election in a row that the Romanow NDP government had “closed 52 hospitals”, without offering clarification of any sort. I believe that they are relying on the emotional “shock” of this statement, but even if this is a well-spun “fact”, what has the government done in the last eleven years in power to remedy any damage this might have done to health care delivery in the province?

The answer: “Nothing at all.”

I still remember some of the heated discussions on health care my relatives from the Canora – Preeceville corridor undertook. Even in the 1950’s, Saskatchewanians considered access to quality health care to be a right of citizenry; the problem was how to make that happen, especially with a world-wide shortage of trained physicians.

Back then, the agricultural community was prepared to settle for the hiring of doctors capable of treating the battlefield scars of farm work and family health concerns. So, as incentive to a complex recruiting process, local communities would build their edifices to the specifications required for the treatment of injuries and services, and in their advertising referred to these new buildings as “hospitals”, all in the hope of luring some doctor to come settle nearby, and perhaps even stay long enough to have a grateful community eventually name a street after them.

One should note that my relatives did not assume that these they could do much more than be competent in the treatment of broken bones, runny noses of their myriad offspring, and the safe delivery of the next addition to their continuously growing families.

Having provided consulting services to medical practitioners from 1986 to 2000, I never met a single physician who wasn’t painfully aware of the limitations of his or her training – and that respect for such skill level was in turn generally shared by their patients. In the end, this doctor-patient “trust” factor cemented a community in its intent of looking after one another – another factor that came to fruition in the evolution of our provincial medical model.

Given these factors, it completely baffles me that a political party, in this case the Descendants of Devine, is able to garner public support for a lie – the “closing” of a hospital, as opposed to its renaming according to its true stature within any community.
The Devine government was, in fact, aware that if rural medical practices were not rationalized vey soon, Saskatchewan taxpayers would pay a heavy financial toll for that delay. Their decision to cease plans for the integration of the newly constructed Regina Plains hospital into south-central and Regina regional health care needs at least indicates such awareness, a decision made on the basis of “safety” concerns, these being the presence of asbestos in its walls. Still, over the past eight years local Saskatchewan Party MLAs have simply omitted “cause” in self-righteous proclamation of the NDP having “closed” Prince Albert’s second hospital – for the same reason as concerned the Plains. Additionally, over the past fifteen years, similar contaminant has also had to be removed from Saskatoon’s Royal University Hospital; fortunately, the asbestos fiber presence there could be worked around.

Over the past ten years, the government has often claimed success in everything from reducing waiting times for surgical procedures to having substantially increased the number of doctors practising in the province. Nothing could be further from the truth; thousands of Saskatchewanians still must rely upon “McDoctor” walk-in clinics for basic health care, as they are unable to find access to family practice.

Some twenty years later, we’re still trying to deal with the effects of the 1990’s Barer-Stoddart report recommending a 10% cutback in its funded physician-education programs. In actuality, general practitioner training was reduced by almost 25%, as the Mulroney government simultaneously decided to prioritize specialist training, in fields that also required longer periods of educational training and practicum. Over the years the government has experimented with programs that encourage graduating physicians from our universities to take up practice here, including “stay at home” forgiveness of student loan debt for every year of service to the province. Still, we are still losing qualified candidates to the more lucrative markets of the United States, AND we’re still having to “recruit” practitioners from elsewhere in the world in order to provide bare necessity medicine to rural Saskatchewan.
And so it goes.


It may seem baffling to explain, but it has taken the Saskatchewan Party less than two decades to turn back the state of provincial health care reform by almost fifty years. Health care costs are once again rising, and despite being in the middle of a pandemic, we again find ourselves lacking qualified medical practitioners, particularly in the area of mental health. Meanwhile, buoyed by federal monies flowing into the province thanks to a federal NDP pressing the Trudeau minority into dealing with the economic hardships this pandemic has imposed, we now find ourselves with a government more concerned with building hospital monuments to its “achievements in medicine”, yet having no idea as to how to slow down the spread of Covid, particularly in the generation that accounts for almost 75% of this virus’s casualties.

Premier Moe’s leadership deficiencies are of his party’s own making. They’ve played to the fringe elements of their basis. Add that to the support from every voter suffering from Turdeay Syndrome hatred and you end up with a vituperative voter base turning Premier Moe gutless whenever a hard decision, especially when dealing with the COVID spread, has to be made.

NDP leader Ryan Meili is not the kind of person to say “I told you so” when the leadership debate’s final question on budgetary concerns had the media chuckling over how the premier’s “cautious approach to keeping businesses open” trumped Dr. Meili’s warnings as to the signs we were already seeing as to the virus spread becoming increasingly difficult to control. But there stood Premier Moe, confident that his “good friend”, Saskatchewan chief medical officer Dr. Saqib Shahab, would make the “correct” decision should further restrictions on citizen movement and fraternization be required.

In every other province in Canada, Alberta excepted, such a decision to curtail economic activity is one made by the premier, in consultation with his Cabinet and medical specialists – but not here?

And so, when during the week of December 11th, Dr. Shahab made that decision on behalf of the government. Come Saturday, there stood in front of the Legislature an “anti-mask convoy/rally” of anti-Trudeau creation deliberately mispronouncing Dr. Shahab’s name, while calling down in the most ignorant of anti-immigrant tones the doctors who’d come from all over the world to fulfil our medical practitioner needs, but were now using that “power” to control the freedoms of Saskatchewan’s “preferred” residents.

Who with a right mind in Saskatchewan could NOT have predicted such a response?