Alexandra Apavaloae, Polytechnics Canada
QUOI Media

In Budget 2021, “A Recovery Plan for Jobs, Growth and Resilience,” the Government of Canada bets big on innovation, research and workforce development as a means to fire up the economy and pull us out of the pandemic. The vision is clear: Canada can become a leader in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biomanufacturing and green technology with the right investments now.

Innovation is mentioned in the budget document more than 167 times.

While investments north of $100 billion are ground-breaking, the focus on innovation is not. In Budget 2017, the Innovation and Skills Plan was also designed to make Canada a world leader in key sectors. Four years later, what has changed?

As Canada again places its hopes on improved innovation performance to drive growth, it is essential to ensure this year’s plan is pragmatic, within reach of everyday Canadians, and the businesses that employ them.

For everyone to benefit, innovation needs to be accessible, easy to produce, available on the market and affordable for those who drive Canada’s economy – small- and mid-sized employers. This is the domain of applied research.

Applied research is about solving problems, implementing ideas for iterative improvements, developing new-to-market innovations and laying plans for growth. It looks at real-world problems in areas like healthcare, green transition and digital adoption. It focuses on near-to-market commercialization activity rather than discovery research, which has its own place in the innovation ecosystem.

Applied research lays the groundwork for world leadership in virtually any field by identifying its leaders, nurturing their growth and engaging the talent pipeline necessary for expansion.

Consider Canada’s aging population. Rather than view the stresses on the healthcare sector and its workforce as an overwhelming whole, applied research makes it possible to target discrete, solvable problems. For example, communicating with non-verbal dementia, stroke or autistic patients has long been a challenge. At Seneca, students are testing Linggo, a new app with promising results for older adults, improving functional communication and promoting social interactions.

Sustainability is another daunting problem of global significance. Once again, breaking it down to bite-sized chunks is an important way to identify solutions and make industry-level improvements. Saskatchewan Polytechnic, in partnership with universities, Indigenous groups, the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the livestock industry, is involved in an interdisciplinary project to conserve the bison population. Combining expertise in reproductive technology, cattle health, genomics, microbiomics and bioinformatics, the project may well generate solutions that can also be applied to an $18 billion dollar cattle industry.

Across sectors, experts have raised alarm bells over delayed technology adoption within Canada’s small and medium enterprises. Polytechnic and college students are ideally positioned to work on applied research projects focused on digital adoption, both boosting business productivity and providing relevant experience to new labour market entrants.

But digital adoption doesn’t look the same in every sector or business.

At the British Columbia Institute of Technology, projects encompass everything from the design of nurse scheduling software to search and rescue machine-learning algorithms. Across the country, at Algonquin College, an applied research project sought to address credibility challenges among drone pilots by developing an online social platform that offers profile verification and proof-of-work.

As for Budget 2021, a two-year, $46.9 million investment in the College and Community Innovation Program is an indication that the federal government recognizes the innovation value of partnerships between polytechnics and the private sector. As we work to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic and build back stronger than before, this injection stands to be an important way to get businesses and communities back on their feet. That is, innovation worth pursuing – incremental, practical, achievable.

While world leadership in key sectors may well be the ultimate goal, Canada cannot neglect today’s challenges in favour of some future, paradigm-shifting innovation. Growth and productivity will certainly include, and most definitely start, with steps in the right direction.

With different rules, companies like Longo’s might now be owned by its employees

by Jon Shell
Quoi Media

Hidden amongst the many newsworthy items in this year’s federal budget is a small, little discussed section with the potential to reshape many Canadian industries.

In it, the government committed to exploring options to remove barriers to employee ownership trusts in Canada.

While that may sound pretty boring, we can look to the recent sale of Longo’s, the beloved Toronto-area grocery chain, to understand just how important this decision might be.

Long rated one of Canada’s best managed companies, and with high marks for its customer service, Longo’s was one of the few major independent retailers left in Canada, where Empire, Loblaw and Metro control 75 per cent of the market. Founded by three brothers in 1956, it remained family-owned and run by one of the sons of the founders, Anthony Longo.

In mid-March that independence ended, as Empire, the owners of Sobeys, announced they would be buying a controlling interest. Media reports described the deal as inevitable; as the Canadian grocery industry continues to consolidate, what chance did a local, family-owned chain have against the giants?

In the United States, however, the fate of grocers like Longo’s is anything but inevitable. A very different option is available with a track record of keeping family grocers both successful and independent: employee ownership.

Publix Super Markets, WinCo Foods, Brookshire Brothers, Harps Food Stores and Buehler’s Fresh Foods are all similar to Longo’s in many ways: humble beginnings, growing through the hard work and risk-taking of the founding family and dedication to tremendous customer experience.

Unlike Longo’s, the founding families of these thriving grocers rebuffed the offers of America’s largest chains and instead chose to sell to their employees.

The difference is due to the Employee Share Ownership Plan (US-ESOP), an employee ownership trust structure created in the U.S. in the 1970s to make it easier for business owners to sell to their employees. Different from share purchase plans, option plans or worker co-ops, the US-ESOP ensures all employees get a stake in the company, at no cost to them, while keeping a traditional management structure in place and ensuring owners receive market value for their shares.

The program has been so successful that tax incentives to increase adoption have been added over time by both Democrats and Republicans, and currently over 14 million Americans hold $1.4 trillion in company wealth under the country’s 6,500 US-ESOPs.
There is strong evidence that employee ownership is better for companies, employees and the economy itself, and grocery might be the best example of that.

No ESOP-owned grocer has ever gone bankrupt. Of the twelve U.S.-based grocery bankruptcies since 2015, eleven were private equity-owned. The twelfth was industry giant Kroger’s failed acquisition of popular locally-owned Lucky’s Market, a grocer of similar size to Longo’s.

Across all industries, employee-owned companies in the U.S. grow faster, are more profitable, are more resilient in downturns, stay in their communities longer and pay their employees more.

US-ESOPs are also a powerful wealth creating engine for workers. On average employee-owners have 92 per cent more wealth than non-employee-owners, while many front-line employees at grocers Winco and Publix have become millionaires.

That doesn’t mean we should blame the Longo family for their choice.

There is very little employee ownership in Canada, as selling to employees here has been a long, complicated and painful process. EllisDon, one of Canada’s largest construction companies, is also one of its most successful employee-owned companies.

But its ownership transition from the founding Smith family has taken decades, and Geoff Smith, its CEO, recently took to LinkedIn to encourage the Canadian government to make it easier.

It appears they listened, and significant employee ownership of the Canadian economy might not be far behind. The UK introduced employee ownership trusts in 2014, providing incentives for owners to choose employee ownership over other options, and investing in awareness building in the business community. Employee ownership has dramatically increased ever since, with almost 100 UK companies choosing this path in 2019 alone.

A recent Canadian Federation of Independent Business survey suggests similar uptake in Canada should be expected.

One day soon, employees at companies like Longo’s might wake up to find they are now owners, with a real path to wealth for them and their families.

Employee ownership trusts increase resiliency, broaden opportunity and reduce ownership concentration, all key elements of a more inclusive economy.

The federal government’s commitment to investigating their potential should be applauded.

by Andrea van Vugt
QUOI Media

Last week at the 93rd edition of the Academy Awards, a movie about an untold American revolution was in the running for one of those shiny gold statues. That movie was Crip Camp: A Disability Revolution, and if you haven’t seen it yet, you should. The movie reveals that if people claim their disabilities, the disability community can unite, take action and make change.

Crip Camp is described as heartfelt, inspiring and emotional. I hit play on the film because I’m a 36-year-old disabled woman, the “R” rating got me curious and, despite the fact that one in five Canadians identifies as disabled, our stories are never on the radar when it comes to popular culture.

I loved the film. I loved it so much I watched it twice. And it blew me away the second time, too. Why? Because it encourages people to claim their disability, it exposes disability civil rights history, and it is a reminder that a movement by the people for the people makes all the difference. Now, not only are disabled people on the big screen, but we’re in the room wearing pretty dresses and freshly pressed suits.

We are telling our story.

So what’s the story? The disability community is the largest minority group in Canada. And – wake up – it’s a minority group that you can become a part of at any point in your life. One in five people is a lot of people.

I didn’t claim my disability until a decade after my epilepsy diagnosis. Although there is no such thing as overcoming a disability, claiming it can be liberating. Of course, not everyone discloses their disability. Many disabilities are invisible, and disclosure can come at the cost of exclusion and judgement.

Thankfully, the rate of exclusion continues to get smaller and our civil rights continue to progress.

There’s more good news on the horizon. For the first time, Canada’s federal government committed to creating a national Disability Benefit in 2020 and elaborated further on the program in the recent federal budget. The mere talk of such an opportunity is a civil rights milestone.

Of all the people living in poverty in Canada, 30 per cent of people in deep poverty have a disability.

I’ve lived in poverty on the $16,000/year that I was allotted from various disability benefits and supports. It was a tiring, isolating cycle, yet it made me thrifty, adaptable and empathetic to other marginalized groups.

We can’t overcome disability, but a national Disability Benefit could allow people in Canada to overcome poverty and participate more fully in society.

So, how do we hold our government accountable to their promise?

We unite. We, as in the disabled, and our allies, unite. Whether you’re a person with a disability, differently abled, disAbled, crippled, handicapped, special needs, specially abled, diffabilitied, Deaf, deaf, simple, special, gimp, impaired… I could go on and on. You. You know who you are.

Let’s take inspiration from the story of Crip Camp and the disability powered movements that created Bill 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Movements by the people for the people. It’s time Canada had a disability awakening too.

Creating a national Disability Benefit is an ambitious task. There are differences between federal and provincial supports, and each province runs its own system of benefits separately, so a national benefit will be challenging to coordinate.

Disability is also an uncomfortable topic for many, so it can be hard to get the conversation going. There are many pieces to the puzzle, but if there’s anything I’ve gained from COVID-19 isolation, it’s a new love of puzzles.

Crip Camp didn’t end up winning the Oscar, but it shared the inspiring history of a revolution that established disability rights in the United States of America and its message continues to resonate around the world.

It’s time for the disability community in Canada to follow suit and claim our crip, so we can unify our movement and be heard.
Let’s go for it. Claim your disability (if you have one), watch the film (it’s available for free on YouTube and it streams in Canada on Netflix), and let’s work together for disability without poverty in Canada.

Andrea van Vugt is a disability advocate from Calgary, Alberta. She is the founder and president of the Disability Pride Alberta Foundation, a consultant for the Canadian Disability Benefit Initiative, and she is working towards a master’s degree in community development.

by Matt Henderson
QUOI Media

In times of economic downturn, investing in infrastructure is often viewed as a way to stimulate the economy and expedite recovery.

U.S. President Biden just announced a $2-trillion infrastructure plan, in part to spur economic activity. Here in Canada, despite less-than-ideal progress on a 12-year, $188-billion Investing in Canada Plan, the truth is that economic and labour market recovery will depend in part on our ability to get building.

But today’s infrastructure investments stand to fulfill additional objectives than those of the past. Rather than solely solving for construction sector unemployment, we need solutions for job losses that have disproportionately affected women and racialized workers. Rather than just building bridges and ports, we need infrastructure investments that stand to help Canada achieve its digital and net-zero ambitions.

The 2021 federal budget laid the groundwork for policies and programs that will enable workforce development and a more inclusive labour market. This is an important start. But as Canada develops a comprehensive plan to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to better support those who will put the “build” in building back better.

First and foremost, this will rely on broadening the source of talent. Canada’s construction industry was facing labour market disruption well before the COVID-19 pandemic. Across the country, the sector is dealing with an aging workforce, with projections suggesting the need to replace almost 260,000 workers – 22% of the current workforce – in response to retirements over the next decade.

The shrinking supply of construction sector talent represents a huge opportunity in response to an economic downturn that has displaced women, people with disabilities, racialized and Indigenous peoples to a much greater extent than other groups. Smart, focused efforts to recruit and retain a broader pool of workers should be a strategic priority. Where efforts are underway to diversify the talent pipeline, they should be scaled and extended. Financial supports must now be accompanied by wraparound supports like job shadowing, mentorship and childcare.

The next priority will be to ensure the workforce has the skills required to build, repair and maintain a different kind of infrastructure, one that includes high-speed broadband, electric vehicle charging stations and rural public transit. With ambitions to reach net-zero by 2050, Canada needs a greater focus on green retrofits and passive buildings. These pragmatic, incremental improvements require a workforce ready to implement them.

While new entrants can be trained with these transitions in mind, there will also be a huge role for lifelong learning. Changing skill requirements are already a reality for those working in construction, engineering, management and the green economy. With new infrastructure investments, a renewed focus on upskilling and reskilling will be required to keep up with new building materials, the evolution of consumer preferences and emerging sustainable practices.

Where speed is critical, micro-credentials are an increasingly popular way to train individuals in new or emerging areas, like mass timber construction. Navigating both employers and workers to such programs will be integral to ensuring infrastructure investments can meet our aspirations for a digital and green recovery.

Finally, we must nurture and support our apprentices. It is no longer good enough to attract young people to the skilled trades only to see half fail to complete their training. Here, a better connection between supply and demand must be managed.

To do so, the government’s election commitment to establish a Canadian Apprenticeship Service requires some refocus. Rather than another wage subsidy program, the Canadian Apprenticeship Service should identify priority trades and coordinate locally curated solutions to support apprentice completion. Leaving apprentices at the mercy of the labour market without support clearly isn’t working.

Given the requirement for a sustainable talent pipeline, it is also time to get serious about mandating apprenticeship positions on federally funded infrastructure projects.

The ability to recover, restart and reignite Canada’s economy will depend on our ability to deliver on our ambitious infrastructure goals. There is no shortage of prospective projects across the country, and with $188 billion committed, no shortage of available funds either. Budget 2021 is a start, but the only way for us to deliver on these investments and actualize these projects are with people. Let’s not forget about those that do the building.

Matt Henderson is Senior Policy Analyst at Polytechnics Canada.

by Jennifer Zelmer and Lisa Poole
QUOI Media

There have been two overlapping tragedies that have befallen long-term care homes in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.
First, the unimaginable death toll itself from COVID-19. Long-term care and retirement home residents accounted for eight in 10 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada as of October 2020 — and they continue to bear the brunt of the pandemic.

Second, blanket visitor restrictions, which were designed to prevent the transmission of the virus, led to significant unintended distress for many residents, staff, families and friends. Essential care partners – which may include family or friends – were often not permitted on site when residents needed them the most.

Today, some essential care partners may still be denied entry, even as other long-term care facilities begin to loosen restrictions. But recent experience has highlighted that essential care partners are not just visitors – they never were. They are critical members of the care team and their inclusion in long-term care settings is vital to the well-being of residents and staff. It’s time for safe re-entry.

What’s an essential care partner?

Essential care partners are people who provide physical, psychological and emotional support, as deemed important by the long-term care resident. This can include support in decision making, care coordination, and continuity of care (for example, support for minor medical procedures, feeding, ambulation, cognitive stimulation, patient hygiene, medication adherence).

Essential care partners can include family members or close friends and are identified by the resident or substitute decision maker. It is estimated that caregivers in Canada contribute up to $24 billion annually in unpaid care to hospital patients, residents in long-term care, home care and other settings.

Essential care partners offer comfort, compassion and joy to residents, they combat loneliness and can be the eyes, ears and voice of some of the most medically vulnerable residents.

There is limited evidence about essential care partners, when properly supported, transmitting COVID-19 in long-term care homes, but we do know that resident isolation can result in increased depression and anxiety and an overall decline in mental health. Residents living with dementia may also show an increase in symptoms.

There is clear evidence that the presence of essential care partners benefits patient safety, patient experience, patient outcomes and patient care.

The absence of essential care partners to support and assist in resident care has also contributed to staff stress and burnout. In some cases, it has been reported that staff cannot consistently provide the level of person-centred care necessary for resident well-being in the absence of essential care partners. This has led to moral distress amongst staff.

Safely welcoming essential care partners back into long-term care facilities is important across the country. They can be trained to use personal protective equipment (PPE), educated in infection prevention and control, and vaccinated. And they should be provided the appropriate tools and resources for re-entry in ways that recognize and support the important roles they play in improving quality of life.

That’s why we created a resource at Healthcare Excellence Canada to help essential care partners safely re-enter long-term care homes during COVID-19. The resource was co-created by essential care partners, for essential care partners. It provides practical information so essential care partners can navigate the current state of long-term care during the pandemic.

And it’s why we are working with homes and policy-makers on pragmatic approaches to re-integrate, welcome and engage essential care partners as part of care teams, during COVID-19 and beyond – from setting mutual expectations and education to COVID-19 screening protocols and caregiver identification.

These resources have been shared widely with long-term care homes, caregiver associations and healthcare organizations with the hope that they will engage with essential care partners and work together to allow their safe re-entry into long-term care. It’s time.

Jennifer Zelmer is President and CEO of Healthcare Excellence Canada, a new organization that brings together the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute.

Lisa Poole, an essential care partner, is the Co-Chair of Dementia Advocacy Canada, a member of Dementia Network Calgary’s Strategic Council, AGE-WELL’s Older Adult and Caregiver Advisory Committee and Imagine Citizens Healthy Living and Aging Working Group

by Allan Grill and Cindy Dumba
QUOI Media

Canadians with serious or progressive chronic illness are feeling especially vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has underscored how quickly circumstances can change.

Talking about a serious illness diagnosis and the impact on life expectancy is difficult.

Many Canadians are uncomfortable having these conversations, even though they know it is important.

Surveys have uncovered this paradox: while 93 per cent of Canadians think it is important to have discussions about goals and values related to their health, only 36 per cent have done so and only 18 per cent have documented them.

As a doctor and a patient, we know these conversations can make a difference to ensure that patients get the care that they want, and avoid what they do not. Research shows that early discussions about goals, values and wishes can improve the quality of life and reduce pain and suffering for a person who is seriously ill.

The tools that health care can offer to prolong life, like CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or a feeding tube, often do not contribute to improved quality of life, especially for those who are frail and have reached the end of curative treatment options for serious illness.

While most Canadians do not want aggressive medical interventions in these situations, many still receive them because their wishes were not known. They may even become unable to speak for themselves, either because of physical or cognitive impairment. Knowing what patients would want can help guide medical decisions that respect their wishes.

Knowing what to say and how to say it can help people get started.

That’s why Choosing Wisely Canada, a national campaign to engage clinicians and patients about what they need and what they don’t when it comes to medical tests, treatments and procedures, is sharing resources to help support this conversation.

So, as a doctor and a patient we are urging you to have these conversations with your care providers and your loved ones.

Receiving a serious illness diagnosis is life-changing for patients. Their plans and ideas of what the future holds suddenly become uncertain. Too often patients are unprepared for what comes next. Serious illness conversations can help patients plan for the future and better understand what to expect.

Doctors and other primary care providers are often the ones who initiate these conversations after the diagnosis of a serious illness, or when they are concerned that their patients have a life-limiting condition.

Here are three things you should know about these important conversations:

First, talk about your understanding of the illness. Having a sense of what a patient’s disease trajectory looks like can help set health priorities in order to better deal with the uncertainty that accompanies it.

Second, discuss your goals and wishes. In the context of serious illness, this can be things like exploring sources of strength and support, as well as fears and worries. Patients often express concerns about how certain medical interventions will impact their independence, and what possible outcomes might result from tests or treatments.

Third, explore your values that can inform decision making and talk about trade-offs.

For example, we talk about how much someone is willing to go through for the sake of added time. Discuss what to expect from treatments that might prolong life at the expense of quality.

These conversations take time, and we strongly encourage people to start talking with their health care providers as well as their loved ones. Having a trusted person who knows your wishes means that they will be honoured and communicated, even if you can no longer speak for yourself.

Don’t wait until it’s too late. It’s time to talk.

Allan Grill is a family physician in Markham and Associate Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto. C ndy Dumba is a patient and family advisor for Choosing Wisely Canada and Choosing Wisely Saskatchewan.

by Andrew Chunilall, Julie Gelfand and Diane Roussin
QUOI Media

When the pandemic began a year ago, the federal government turned to community sector organizations — the Red Cross, Community Foundations and United Ways — to channel $350 million in emergency funding to areas of need across Canada. With this support, food banks, women’s shelters and other community organizations were able to quickly meet increased and changing demands for their services.

With lean operations and extensive community connections, the charities, non-profits, social enterprises and foundations that comprise Canada’s community sector are governments’ natural partners. This should not only be the case in emergencies, but also in shaping and implementing the larger transitions ahead in the post-pandemic period.

Public policy and finance are understandably focused on resilient recovery and rebuilding, with unprecedented investments in physical infrastructure to create green jobs that address the imbalance between humanity and the natural environment. To fulfill the potential of this great transition, our social infrastructure needs attention too.

“Social infrastructure” includes policies, practices and relationships that enable us to create a more resilient, inclusive and sustainable society, from the grassroots to the global, and spanning healthcare, education, culture and our democratic processes.

COVID-19 has revealed systemic injustices and vulnerabilities including institutionalized racism, substandard seniors housing, the lack of paid sick leave and inadequate childcare. To this list we can add Indigenous reconciliation, the income and wealth gap and the life- and budget-sapping increases in chronic disease.

In the values-based economy that Mark Carney, Mariana Mazzucato and others are calling for, solving these challenges defines pathways to inclusive economic well-being. It is imperative to broaden the scope of infrastructure funding beyond the physical, to catalyze socio-economic transition at the regional, community and household levels.

The 2018 Inclusive Innovation Report from the federal Steering Group on Social Innovation and Social Finance provided a modernization agenda for the social sector which could function as a blueprint as we transition through a post-COVID world. It calls for a federal Social Finance Fund, announced in the fall 2018 budget update but not yet implemented, to invest in social enterprises – focused on such things as the construction of affordable homes, Indigenous entrepreneurship and micro-credit for immigrants.

The report calls for investment in improved data management capacity in community organizations – for designing and measuring interventions in social systems and to support development of a ‘solutions marketplace,’ where public and private investment can complement grants and donations by financing improved outcomes on issues ranging from homelessness to youth employment.

In addition to capital and data, we need evidence. The report calls for the creation of ‘What Works Centres,’ similar to those in the UK — where policy makers, program designers and the public can access plain language summaries of current research on issues such as chronic disease prevention, early child development and mental health.

Government oversight needs to evolve from the current regime, where CRA micro-monitors activities around charitable donations, to one that recognizes that the sector is increasingly networked, linking grassroots civic engagement to national priorities, in collaboration with all levels of government, the private sector and academia, to effect systemic change.

We are all stronger if we work together. In this time of societal transition, governments, businesses and the community sector alike need tools for collaborative innovation focused on systemic change.

The most important recommendation in the report — and something we need urgently — is a permanent social innovation council with government, and eventually the private sector too, so that Canadians know that the organizations they support with their donations and their tax dollars are being heard on matters critical to social and economic well-being while we transition to a zero-carbon economy.

In light of the current crisis, we suggest that this be framed as a ‘transition innovation council,’ involving all sectors in supporting community transitions in line with Canada’s commitment to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It should be similar to and complementing the recently announced Net-Zero Advisory Body reporting to the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change.
Just as Canada’s health care system integrates contributions by the public, private and community sectors, so too must efforts to recover and build a more inclusive and sustainable society. As governments and the private sector plan multi-billion dollar investments in physical infrastructure, it’s important to involve the community sector in building better social infrastructure too.

Andrew Chunilall is CEO of Community Foundations of Canada. Julie Gelfand is Former Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. // Diane Roussin is Project Director for the Winnipeg Boldness Project.

by Hal Johnson and Joanne McLeod, with John Muscedere
QUOI Media

Many Canadians of a certain vintage will recall our 90-second “Body Break” TV spots. In April of 1989, we started showing Canadians how to incorporate healthy eating and physical activity into their lives. The public service announcements — friendly reminders while snacking in front of the TV — were part of a wider strategy to address the worrisome drop in Canadians’ level of physical activity.

Today, regular physical activity is universally recognized as a pillar of preventative medicine. Even so, four out of five Canadians are still not spending the recommended minimum 150 minutes per week engaged in physical activity.

This was before the COVID-19 pandemic.

As fitness and health experts, we are concerned that prolonged lockdowns and restrictions during the pandemic have reduced physical activity levels even further.

People who entered the pandemic with a structured, individualized workout regime in place have been most likely able to maintain it. However, those who relied on activities like team sports or daily errands or volunteering to stay limber may have had difficulty adapting to the abrupt ground shift.

A sharp decline in physical activity can set a number of interlocking health issues in motion, including loss of energy, muscle strength and balance, especially among older adults. The result is increased frailty which undermines the body’s ability to cope with minor illness and can lead to more serious health deterioration requiring acute care.

The pandemic has made resilience, especially among older Canadians, more important than ever. There are currently 1.6 million Canadians living with frailty. In 10 years, this number is expected to rise to two and a half million. But frailty can be prevented.
The Canadian Frailty Network has developed a five-step AVOID Frailty strategy that provides a holistic framework to support healthy aging.

The first, and most foundational, step is “Activity.” Staying active improves your ability to perform daily tasks, prevents weak bones and muscle loss, improves joint mobility, improves sleep quality, reduces the risk of chronic conditions, extends years of activity and independent living, lowers the risk of dementia and reduces the likelihood of a fall and further injuries.
In 2017-18, 81 per cent of injury hospitalizations in Canadians aged 65 and older were due to falls.

So, we’ve been invited to get Canadians moving again, to help get hearts pumping, strengthen muscles and improve balance.
With the Canadian Frailty Network, we have created new two-minute videos designed to prevent frailty among older Canadians. We demonstrate exercises that can be done in the safety and security of your own home with no special equipment required.

No one was ready for the instability caused by COVID-19. Unfortunately, for many, physical activity was the first item to fall off the priority list.

Since March 2020, non-profit organizations focused on healthy living have built up resources to help Canadians of any age prevent the onset of frailty during this extraordinarily challenging time. Here are some of the top recommendations and tips from the Canadian Frailty Network.

Explore these many resources and share them with friends and loved ones:
• The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) developed 24-hour movement guidelines grouped by age. Learn more about how much you should be sitting, moving and sleeping each day.

• Join the 100,000 + people who have downloaded the ParticipAction app to help keep you motivated and on track with recommended movement guidelines.

• Try a YMCA workout at home: https://www.ymcahome.ca/yfitness.

• Study ballet through Canada’s National Ballet School.

• Walking, even during the winter months, is great for the body and mind. To prevent a fall, be sure to wear ice grippers. Your local library may even have them on loan.

• Explore a new outdoor activity, like birdwatching.

• Don’t forget – household chores count, too!

• For other COVID-friendly, low-risk outdoor activities, visit: https://www.cbc.ca/parents/play/view/outdoor-activities-covid-19.

Together, we can all ‘keep fit and have fun.’

For over 30 years, Hal Johnson and Joanne McLeod, under the umbrella of BodyBreak, have been encouraging Canadians to live a healthy, active lifestyle.

John Muscedere is CEO of the Canadian Frailty Network and a Professor in the School of Medicine at Queen’s University.

by John Muscedered and John Puxty
QUOI Media

COVID-19 has framed older Canadians as frail and vulnerable during the pandemic – for good reason. The pandemic has hit older adults particularly hard, accounting for the majority of those suffering from serious illness and death.

Fear of COVID-19 contagion continues to impact seniors far more than most other Canadians, forcing them into stricter lockdown measures for their own health and safety.

What’s forgotten in the focus on keeping seniors safe is that older adults aren’t solely vulnerable and reliant but contribute greatly to our economy and to our society. Canada’s older adults should not only be seen as victims of COVID-19, but also as a resource to help society recover from it.

Canada’s older adults are living longer now than ever before. The oldest Baby Boomers are turning 75 this year and are more committed than any other generation in the past to aging well, aging in-place and keeping healthy and active as long as they can.
This is shown in the statistics of seniors who are still actively working.

The employment rate of seniors in the Canadian labour force has more than doubled since 2000. In 2015, one in five Canadians aged 65 and older, or nearly 1.1 million seniors, reported working during the year. In 2018, Stats Canada reported that 28.4 per cent of Canadians 60 and older who reported working as their major activity were self-employed.

More seniors now hold post-secondary degrees than in the past and this seems to keep them working longer. Older Canadians with at least a bachelor’s degree were almost two times more likely to continue working after the age of 65 than those with a high school diploma.

It’s important to note, however, that sometimes seniors are still in the workforce because they cannot afford to retire and not because they choose to continue to work.

Employment income was the main source of income for 43.8 per cent of seniors who worked in 2015. Those without private pensions — which have declined over the past 30 years – are 1.5 times more likely to continue working than those seniors with private pensions.

It’s not just through employment – and the taxes they continue to pay while they work – that seniors help grow the economy. Seniors are also committed to giving back and building their communities.

Older Canadians are committed volunteers. They provide a wealth of knowledge, experience and skills that can be of great benefit to their communities. Seniors are responsible for one in five volunteer hours given to non-profits and charities. Volunteer Canada values a volunteer hour at $27, which means seniors are providing upwards of $10.9 billion of unpaid work into our economy annually.

Seniors are not only generous with their time but also with their money. In 2017, Canadian seniors provided 42 per cent of all donations to charities, totaling over $4 billion. This is close to half of all charitable donations in Canada.

Almost one-quarter of Canadian seniors aged 65 years and older are also caregivers. In 2018, 1.5 million of the 7.8 million Canadian caregivers were aged 65 years and older.

During the pandemic, seniors have stepped up to support communities through food bank drives, delivering groceries, driving others to appointments, making sure neighbours aren’t isolated, and volunteering for charities to support Canada’s most vulnerable, regardless of their age. Also, some seniors, such as doctors and nurses, have come out retirement to help out.

All of this generosity and employment activity doesn’t just have benefits for our economy and society. By keeping active and engaged through paid or charitable work, research shows seniors receive benefits to their own health and well-being.

A one-sided view of older Canadians as frail and vulnerable does not describe the vast majority of Canada’s 6.8 million seniors. They have a lifetime of experience to contribute and many are simply not done yet.

Canada needs to tap into their energy and expertise as we face some of the greatest challenges in many generations due to COVID-19 and the resulting economic damage it has caused.

John Muscedere is CEO of the Canadian Frailty Network and a Professor in the School of Medicine at Queen’s University.

John Puxty is the Director of the Centre for Studies in Aging and Health at Providence Care and an Associate Professor in the School of Medicine at Queen’s University.

by Linda Silas
QUOI Media

A COVID-free future is within our reach – a future where it’s safe to hug again and where our smiles no longer need to be hidden behind a mask. To get there, we will need a robust vaccination drive. We will need Canadians to roll up their sleeves and get vaccinated. But we will also need to be patient. Immunizing the country won’t happen overnight. It will be an incremental process informed by science and one that seeks to immediately stem the loss of life.

Earlier this month, the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions encouraged all health care workers, all essential workers and the general public to receive the vaccine when they become eligible. We also urged governments across Canada to speed up the rollout of the vaccine, especially to those most likely to experience severe illness, such as seniors, Indigenous people and racialized people – all of whom have been shown to be most at risk of infection.

Nurses have also signaled that they are ready and willing to step up and help the government with the vaccine rollout by joining health care teams at vaccination clinics across Canada. While the news of some delays in delivery of the Pfizer vaccine may give us pause, governments must strive to speed up the immunization and rapidly increase the number of clinics where the vaccine is available. This is how we will contain this virus and counter its spread.

What’s also been lacking in Canada’s vaccine delivery program is evidence-based information. Within this vacuum, misinformation, vaccine myths and mistrust have thrived. Sadly, many Canadians are hesitant to get vaccinated, particularly among marginalized communities who, we recognize, have all too often experienced negative interactions with the medical community.

As nurses, we believe that any risk posed by the vaccine is far outweighed by the benefits in being protected from COVID-19.
As with any other medical treatment, informed consent is required. It’s our job, as health professionals, to provide facts – and yes, empathy – when patients express concerns about being vaccinated. Everyone who gets the vaccine must understand the benefits of immunization, as well as any potential risks. All Canadians should be empowered to make an informed decision.

Some individuals have expressed concerns about the record turnaround time for these vaccines. Producing multiple vaccines in less than a year was the result of a momentous global effort, harnessing the ingenuity of a scientific community united in a common objective. Large-scale trials on the efficacy of vaccines involved tens of thousands of participants, including many from diverse backgrounds. The trials resulted in high rates of protection with few or no reported serious adverse events. Despite the compressed timelines, no shortcuts were taken: the same standards were applied to these vaccines as for any other vaccines that have been developed.

In Canada, we know the approval process by Health Canada is safe and effective; their assessment of scientific and clinical evidence is done independently and is known to be stringent. We also know that historically, immunization programs have saved countless lives worldwide. The COVID-19 vaccines approved thus far have the potential to provide much-needed protection against the continued spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus but this will only happen if sufficient numbers choose to be vaccinated.

As Canada’s nurses, we want to encourage all those living in Canada to receive the vaccine as soon as they are able. Together, we can contain this virus, end the pandemic and take part in Canada’s post-pandemic recovery.

Linda Silas is a nurse and President of the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, representing nearly 200,000 nurses and student nurses across the country.